<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Girl Is Watching: Sotomayer, Palin &amp; Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegirlrevolution.com/a-girl-is-watching-sotomayer-palin-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/a-girl-is-watching-sotomayer-palin-clinton/</link>
	<description>Growing Girls With Purpose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shauna</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/a-girl-is-watching-sotomayer-palin-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Shauna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/?p=1989#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>I am commenting on this pretty late so I don&#039;t know if anyone will read this, but, here goes.

I remember watching the Thomas/Hill debaucle when I was a young teen. My mom was a vehement supporter of Hill whilst my dad was equally vehement for Thomas. I remember wondering why my Dad thought she was lying because she was a woman. In retrospect, I don&#039;t think that is necessarily why he questioned her story (although I still DISAGREE with him) but my young, not yet fully formed brain associated his comments with her gender.

I may not agree with Sotomayor&#039;s nomination or past judicial decisions or expositions; but, I do loathe that gender is still such a seemingly &quot;free pass&quot; for bias. 

I don&#039;t have to agree with these women. I DO respect that, although they know they will be &quot;crucified&quot; by critics - at a degree much more intense than men, they are still willing to step forward and try. It is by the trying that we will ultimately be able to conquer some of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am commenting on this pretty late so I don&#8217;t know if anyone will read this, but, here goes.</p>
<p>I remember watching the Thomas/Hill debaucle when I was a young teen. My mom was a vehement supporter of Hill whilst my dad was equally vehement for Thomas. I remember wondering why my Dad thought she was lying because she was a woman. In retrospect, I don&#8217;t think that is necessarily why he questioned her story (although I still DISAGREE with him) but my young, not yet fully formed brain associated his comments with her gender.</p>
<p>I may not agree with Sotomayor&#8217;s nomination or past judicial decisions or expositions; but, I do loathe that gender is still such a seemingly &#8220;free pass&#8221; for bias. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have to agree with these women. I DO respect that, although they know they will be &#8220;crucified&#8221; by critics &#8211; at a degree much more intense than men, they are still willing to step forward and try. It is by the trying that we will ultimately be able to conquer some of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Greene / The Logistician</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/a-girl-is-watching-sotomayer-palin-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-4331</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Greene / The Logistician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/?p=1989#comment-4331</guid>
		<description>That folks expect that the cultural pendulum will not, or should not, swing back and forth, and that Newtonian physics are not applicable to life, is fascinating.  Elected officials come with all points of view, and represent the full spectrum of values.  Why shouldn’t the people who they appoint?  &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ndjstl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You Can&#039;t Always Get What You Want&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That folks expect that the cultural pendulum will not, or should not, swing back and forth, and that Newtonian physics are not applicable to life, is fascinating.  Elected officials come with all points of view, and represent the full spectrum of values.  Why shouldn’t the people who they appoint?  &#8220;<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ndjstl" rel="nofollow">You Can&#8217;t Always Get What You Want</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

