<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devaluation of Motherhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/</link>
	<description>Growing Girls With Purpose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Dana, I agree. I think we had no other choice than to play by their rules - or they weren&#039;t going to let us play at all. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, maybe the time has come to change the rules and make the workplace more family-friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana, I agree. I think we had no other choice than to play by their rules &#8211; or they weren&#8217;t going to let us play at all. </p>
<p>But, maybe the time has come to change the rules and make the workplace more family-friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Obviously adoptive mothers are mothers. I mention pushing a human out of my crotch, as opposed to adoption, only because that was my experience. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Vaginal birth doesn&#039;t make one more &quot;mother&quot; than c-section birth. Nor does conception and birth make someone more of a mother than the painstaking, heartbreaking, expensive and time consuming process of adoption. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The workplace values NO mothering roles. If it did, adoptive mothers and birth mothers would get a reasonable amount of leave. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Many countries give mothers one or two years of leave - because they actually VALUE motherhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously adoptive mothers are mothers. I mention pushing a human out of my crotch, as opposed to adoption, only because that was my experience. </p>
<p>Vaginal birth doesn&#8217;t make one more &#8220;mother&#8221; than c-section birth. Nor does conception and birth make someone more of a mother than the painstaking, heartbreaking, expensive and time consuming process of adoption. </p>
<p>The workplace values NO mothering roles. If it did, adoptive mothers and birth mothers would get a reasonable amount of leave. </p>
<p>Many countries give mothers one or two years of leave &#8211; because they actually VALUE motherhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>As a stay-at-home mom who obviously comes from a very different worldview than you, I must say that I appreciate this post.  And I agree.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I used to work for two principals at once...one woman and one man.  My female boss was very difficult to work with...very controlling and really seemed to strive to be the stereotypical domineering male type.  The man, on the other hand, was quite easy to get along with and very flexible in his management.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now this is just an anecdote and doesn&#039;t mean anything, but I always wondered if this is what we really wanted when we (as women) decided we wanted to enter the workforce and break through the glass ceiling.  Did we want to strip ourselves completely of our femininity to be successful?  Do we have to make ourselves masculine?  Or is there room in the workplace for what a woman might bring?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t know...these were just my thoughts.  And I get tired of being told directly or indirectly that my choice to stay home has somehow hurt the cause of women.  I have three daughter and a son.  I think I have enough of an investment in the future of mankind to guard it closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a stay-at-home mom who obviously comes from a very different worldview than you, I must say that I appreciate this post.  And I agree.</p>
<p>I used to work for two principals at once&#8230;one woman and one man.  My female boss was very difficult to work with&#8230;very controlling and really seemed to strive to be the stereotypical domineering male type.  The man, on the other hand, was quite easy to get along with and very flexible in his management.  </p>
<p>Now this is just an anecdote and doesn&#8217;t mean anything, but I always wondered if this is what we really wanted when we (as women) decided we wanted to enter the workforce and break through the glass ceiling.  Did we want to strip ourselves completely of our femininity to be successful?  Do we have to make ourselves masculine?  Or is there room in the workplace for what a woman might bring?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;these were just my thoughts.  And I get tired of being told directly or indirectly that my choice to stay home has somehow hurt the cause of women.  I have three daughter and a son.  I think I have enough of an investment in the future of mankind to guard it closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, your own post devalues motherhood for those who came about the role by adoption because the only motherhood you mention is by way of squeezing a human out of your crotch. If you want to see some real devaluation, check out how many companies don&#039;t provide adoption benefits for time off. That&#039;s messed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, your own post devalues motherhood for those who came about the role by adoption because the only motherhood you mention is by way of squeezing a human out of your crotch. If you want to see some real devaluation, check out how many companies don&#8217;t provide adoption benefits for time off. That&#8217;s messed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/devaluation-of-motherhood/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I always love how you expand concepts.  Like broadening motherhood to include all women, or broadening beauty to include all women.  You&#039;re a great inspiration to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love how you expand concepts.  Like broadening motherhood to include all women, or broadening beauty to include all women.  You&#8217;re a great inspiration to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

