<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knaamys (pro. names) of the 20th Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegirlrevolution.com/knaamys-pro-names-of-the-20th-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/knaamys-pro-names-of-the-20th-century/</link>
	<description>Growing Girls With Purpose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shauna</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/knaamys-pro-names-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-6158</link>
		<dc:creator>Shauna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/?p=3246#comment-6158</guid>
		<description>For me, not only are the spellings bizarre - but some of the choices of names are bizarre. I wrote an article about it 3 or 4 years ago and while I was researching - I came across the following names (no joke): Marlboro, Formica Dinette, Daffy D and Yoda. If I remember right, Yoda&#039;s middle name was Marie. We are going to have some bizarre things happening in nursing homes someday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, not only are the spellings bizarre &#8211; but some of the choices of names are bizarre. I wrote an article about it 3 or 4 years ago and while I was researching &#8211; I came across the following names (no joke): Marlboro, Formica Dinette, Daffy D and Yoda. If I remember right, Yoda&#8217;s middle name was Marie. We are going to have some bizarre things happening in nursing homes someday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/knaamys-pro-names-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-6157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/?p=3246#comment-6157</guid>
		<description>I named my son Zackary. My thinking was that it was phonetic and therefore easier. Now I wish I&#039;d just named him Zachary. 

In my limited experience with this crop of names the boys names are as misspelled and cutesified as the girls. 

My thinking was, it&#039;s a new century - isn&#039;t it time for a new trend? (Also, no one from the 19th century is living, so they are harder to lecture and impossible to change.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I named my son Zackary. My thinking was that it was phonetic and therefore easier. Now I wish I&#8217;d just named him Zachary. </p>
<p>In my limited experience with this crop of names the boys names are as misspelled and cutesified as the girls. </p>
<p>My thinking was, it&#8217;s a new century &#8211; isn&#8217;t it time for a new trend? (Also, no one from the 19th century is living, so they are harder to lecture and impossible to change.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby@AppMtn</title>
		<link>http://thegirlrevolution.com/knaamys-pro-names-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby@AppMtn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegirlrevolution.com/?p=3246#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>As a baby name blogger, I hear what you&#039;re saying.  And I do wonder if parents aren&#039;t somehow undervaluing their daughters by calling them by cutesy appellations like Kayci or Cayleigh.

Only thing is, it isn&#039;t a 20th century phenomenon.  If you think on it for a minute, the 20th century was the first time when a standardized spelling was possible.  And by then, it was too late.  Plus, waves of nickname-names have happened before, with Sadie and Ettie and Lollie given instead of Sara, Henrietta and Laura.

Here&#039;s my article on the first subject:

http://appellationmountain.net/2009/10/28/in-defense-of-isobel-and-aiden-ten-reasons-to-embrace-variant-spellings/

After all, I can see how a smart person might decide to name her daughter Kate or Katharine instead of Katherine or a son Zackary, even though Zachary is the commonly accepted spelling.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a baby name blogger, I hear what you&#8217;re saying.  And I do wonder if parents aren&#8217;t somehow undervaluing their daughters by calling them by cutesy appellations like Kayci or Cayleigh.</p>
<p>Only thing is, it isn&#8217;t a 20th century phenomenon.  If you think on it for a minute, the 20th century was the first time when a standardized spelling was possible.  And by then, it was too late.  Plus, waves of nickname-names have happened before, with Sadie and Ettie and Lollie given instead of Sara, Henrietta and Laura.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my article on the first subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://appellationmountain.net/2009/10/28/in-defense-of-isobel-and-aiden-ten-reasons-to-embrace-variant-spellings/" rel="nofollow">http://appellationmountain.net/2009/10/28/in-defense-of-isobel-and-aiden-ten-reasons-to-embrace-variant-spellings/</a></p>
<p>After all, I can see how a smart person might decide to name her daughter Kate or Katharine instead of Katherine or a son Zackary, even though Zachary is the commonly accepted spelling.  <img src='http://thegirlrevolution.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

